Saturday, April 19, 2025

CHELSEA VS FULHAM


Chelsea will hope to resurrect their faltering quest to qualify for the Champions League when the travel to play ninth-placed Fulham at Craven Cottage on Sunday in their 33rd Premier League game of the season.

The Cottagers lost 1-0 against Bournemouth on Monday and their tally of 48 points is six fewer than Chelsea, who are in sixth place following their disappointing 2-2 draw with Ipswich Town last Sunday.

Fulham's defeat against Bournemouth came about due to Antoine Semenyo's first-minute winner, and they have conceded first in their past four games.

Boss Marco Silva will be frustrated by his side's Premier League form, with the hosts alternating between defeats and victories in their last seven top-flight fixtures, dropping 12 points in that period.

The Cottagers still have an outside chance of qualifying for Europe given they are six points from Aston Villa, who are in seventh place, and that spot will likely be enough to participate in the Conference League at minimum but may be enough for Europa League football.

If Fulham are to make a late charge for the European spots, they will have to improve considerably at the back considering they have conceded eight in their four most recent outings, failing to score twice in that time.

Silva's side have also alternated between wins and losses in their past seven home games, though they came out on top against teams such as Liverpool, Nottingham Forest and Tottenham Hotspur in those matches

Chelsea had to rescue a point against relegation candidates Ipswich after heading into the half-time interval 2-0 down, and it should be noted that their 34 shots on the day was roughly double their per 90 average this season (16.4).

The Blues were also beaten 2-1 by Legia Warsaw on Thursday in the second leg of their Conference League quarter-final tie, but they advanced into the semi-finals thanks to their 3-0 victory in the first leg on April 10.

Manager Enzo Maresca has faced significant scrutiny in the second half of the season, though his side are currently only one point from fifth-placed Manchester City, who occupy the final Champions League qualification spot.

However, Chelsea have failed to win three of their four most recent Premier League fixtures, drawing twice while scoring just three times.

Maresca also suffered a 2-1 defeat when he last faced Silva in the top flight on December 26, but that was the club's only loss against Fulham in their past five meetings, with the Blues winning on three occasions.

Chelsea are winless away from home in the league since December 8, a period in which they lost five, drew three and failed to find the back of the net in five matches.


Home Icon
Previews icon 4
Scores icon 4
News icon 2
Tables icon 2
Teams icon 3

Sports Mole words bigger AMP 2

Preview: Fulham vs. Chelsea - prediction, team news, lineups

Chelsea will hope to resurrect their faltering quest to qualify for the Champions League when the travel to play ninth-placed Fulham at Craven Cottage on Sunday in their 33rd Premier League game of the season.

The Cottagers lost 1-0 against Bournemouth on Monday and their tally of 48 points is six fewer than Chelsea, who are in sixth place following their disappointing 2-2 draw with Ipswich Town last Sunday.


Match preview


Preview: Fulham vs. Chelsea - prediction, team news, lineups

Fulham's defeat against Bournemouth came about due to Antoine Semenyo's first-minute winner, and they have conceded first in their past four games.

Boss Marco Silva will be frustrated by his side's Premier League form, with the hosts alternating between defeats and victories in their last seven top-flight fixtures, dropping 12 points in that period.

The Cottagers still have an outside chance of qualifying for Europe given they are six points from Aston Villa, who are in seventh place, and that spot will likely be enough to participate in the Conference League at minimum but may be enough for Europa League football.

If Fulham are to make a late charge for the European spots, they will have to improve considerably at the back considering they have conceded eight in their four most recent outings, failing to score twice in that time.

Silva's side have also alternated between wins and losses in their past seven home games, though they came out on top against teams such as Liverpool, Nottingham Forest and Tottenham Hotspur in those matches.

Preview: Fulham vs. Chelsea - prediction, team news, lineups

Chelsea had to rescue a point against relegation candidates Ipswich after heading into the half-time interval 2-0 down, and it should be noted that their 34 shots on the day was roughly double their per 90 average this season (16.4).

The Blues were also beaten 2-1 by Legia Warsaw on Thursday in the second leg of their Conference League quarter-final tie, but they advanced into the semi-finals thanks to their 3-0 victory in the first leg on April 10.

Manager Enzo Maresca has faced significant scrutiny in the second half of the season, though his side are currently only one point from fifth-placed Manchester City, who occupy the final Champions League qualification spot.

However, Chelsea have failed to win three of their four most recent Premier League fixtures, drawing twice while scoring just three times.

Maresca also suffered a 2-1 defeat when he last faced Silva in the top flight on December 26, but that was the club's only loss against Fulham in their past five meetings, with the Blues winning on three occasions.

Chelsea are winless away from home in the league since December 8, a period in which they lost five, drew three and failed to find the back of the net in five matches.

Fulham Premier League form:


Fulham form (all competitions):


Chelsea Premier League form:


Chelsea form (all competitions):



Team News

Preview: Fulham vs. Chelsea - prediction, team news, lineups

Fulham come into the clash with a relatively small list of absentees, with wingers Harry Wilson and Reiss Nelson their only concerns, though Wilson could return at the end of the month.

Raul Jimenez may be trusted to lead the Cottagers' forward line ahead of a supporting cast consisting of Alex IwobiAndreas Pereira and Ryan Sessegnon.

Sasa Lukic and Sander Berge are certain to appear at the base of midfield, and they could start in front of centre-backs Joachim Andersen and Calvin Bassey.

As for Chelsea, central defender Wesley Fofana and goalkeeper Gabriel Slonina are the Blues' only injury absentees who may have had an impact on Maresca's selection plans.

Centre-backs Levi Colwill and Trevoh Chalobah played no part in Thursday's clash against Legia Warsaw, and they can be expected to protect goalkeeper Robert Sanchez on Sunday.

Moises Caicedo and Enzo Fernandez are likely to be stationed in midfield, while Cole Palmer will play in an attacking role behind striker Nicolas Jackson.


Fulham possible starting lineup:
Leno; Castagne, Andersen, Bassey, Robinson; Lukic, Berge; Iwobi, Pereira, Sessegnon; Jimenez

Chelsea possible starting lineup:
Sanchez; Gusto, Chalobah, Colwill, Cucurella; Caicedo, Fernandez; Madueke, Palmer, Neto; Jackson.

We say: Fulham 2-1 Chelsea

Chelsea's struggles in the Premier League away from home are concerning, and they could find it difficult to create chances in the final third on Sunday.

Although Fulham have proven to be inconsistent, they have managed to secure positive results against some of the division's best, and they may close the gap to Chelsea by beating them at Craven Cottage.

Friday, April 4, 2025

Luis Enrique demands PSG to sign Barcelona fan favourite this summer – report

Barça News

Published

 49 minutes ago 

on

 04/04/2025
Photo by Jan Kruger/Getty Images

At a time when Barcelona have been performing at a level not seen since the time Luis Enrique used to be in charge of the club, it is perhaps a bittersweet feeling for Barça fans to know that Enrique’s PSG are also doing well this season.

Along with Barça, PSG are among the best-performing teams in Europe this season, as evidenced by their performances in both Ligue 1 and the Champions League.

However, despite building a solid squad this season, Enrique is already looking ahead and wants to strengthen his squad further in the coming summer.

Enrique demands move for Gavi

To that end, a recent report from Fichajes has revealed that one of the players Enrique is targeting is none other than Gavi.

It appears the former Barça coach has demanded the signing of the young midfielder, who is regarded as one of the future leaders in Catalonia.

Despite struggling with injuries over the past year or so, Gavi is considered vital to Barcelona’s plans, even though Hansi Flick may not have used him as prominently this season.

Luis Enrique wants to sign Gavi (Photo by Clive Brunskill/Getty Images)

This might be due to Gavi’s fitness, with the manager taking a cautious approach with the fan-favourite midfielder following his return from an ACL injury.

Nevertheless, the report adds that Enrique shares a good relationship with Gavi and wants him to be a part of his setup at PSG.

Enrique, in fact, is convinced that Gavi could be an ideal fit in his system, bringing more dynamism and aggression to the creative third of the pitch. Not to mention, he can also reunite with his former Barcelona teammate Ousmane Dembele.

That being said, Barcelona still consider Gavi a key piece, not just for the present but for the future as well. Therefore, convincing the Catalans to give up on the midfielder could be next to impossible.

A lot may also depend on Gavi’s own wishes. But judging by the player’s commitment to Barcelona, it is unlikely he will likely to move anywhere anytime soon.

What did you think of this article?
PoorPoor
 
GoodGood
 
ExcellentExcellent

Thursday, April 3, 2025

FIFA has banned three countries from World Cup for 'political reasons'

 

Man City and Chelsea fans banned from attending Club World Cup this summer


Three countries have been barred from competing at the World Cup.


FIFA have banned three countries from competing at the World Cup due to political reasons.

The 2026 edition, which will be staged in the United States, Canada and Mexico, will see an increase in qualified teams from 32 to 48.

Teams will be split into 16 three-team groups, with the top two in each group reaching the knockout stages.

Though the change of format has had its critics, it does allow nations to qualify who otherwise would not have had the opportunity to under the old system.

Two nations have been technically banned from the tournament. Russia are currently suspended from playing in FIFA-sanctioned tournaments due to their February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

FIFA President Gianni Infantino has recently commented on Russia's ban (Twitter)FIFA President Gianni Infantino has recently commented on Russia's ban (Twitter)
FIFA President Gianni Infantino has recently commented on Russia's ban (Twitter)

They instead play international friendlies against nations largely outside of Europe, with friendlies during the most recent international window seeing them take on Zambia and Grenada.

Meanwhile, FIFA suspended FECAFOOT, the governing body of the Republic of the Congo, due to 'third-party interference in its affairs'.

Congo are not officially banned from the World Cup, but FECAFOOT cancelled its remaining qualifying matches following the announcement of the suspension.

Previously, two other nations were banned from world football's biggest tournament specifically due to political reasons.

During the period of racial apartheid in the country, South Africa were suspended by FIFA in 1961.

The ban would be lifted several years later in 1963, with then-FIFA President Stanley Rous being in support of the apartheid-era South African FA.

FIFA even put South Africa in an Asian qualifying group to avoid them facing African opposition, but other African nations successfully lobbied for the country to be suspended again.

South Africa would be expelled from FIFA entirely in 1976 after Rous was replaced by Joao Havelange, with other sports also choosing to boycott the country entirely.

They were reinstated in 1992 and won the African Cup of Nations in 1996, before hosting the World Cup in 2010.

And in 1992, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was banned from international football as part of United Nations sanctions against the country.

Following the breakup of Yugoslavia, the FRY name continued to be used by Serbia and Montenegro, who were still part of Yugoslavia until 2003.

FIFA World Cup answer on Pointless quiz show

The two nations would then play as Serbia and Montenegro on the international stage, qualifying for the 2006 World Cup. Both nations gained full independence in June 2006.

Featured Image Credit: Getty

Topics: FIFAFootball World Cup

Three countries have been banned from playing in the 2026 FIFA World Cup Three countries have been banned from playing in the 2026 FIFA World Cup

HomeFootballFootball NewsFIFA World Cup

Three countries have been banned from playing in the 2026 FIFA World Cup

The competition is taking place in the USA, Canada and Mexico.


Two more countries have had their football associations suspended by FIFA due to 'serious circumstances' ahead of the 2026 World Cup.

The next edition of the global tournament which is held every four years will take place across three countries in the summer of 2026.

The USA will be the biggest host of the trio with a total of 11 stadiums due to stage games, with three cities in Mexico and two in Canada completing the tournament's composition.

Argentina are the defending champions having won their third World Cup at the competition held in the winter of 2022 in Qatar, beating France on penalties following a 3-3 draw after extra-time.

Last year, FIFA and UEFA decided to uphold Russia's ban from worldwide competitions through to the 2026 World Cup.

The Russian Football Union (RFU) has banned from both FIFA and UEFA competitions since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.

That means neither the men's nor women's teams can play in the World Cup or European Championships. Domestic club sides also cannot play in UEFA competitions.

In Europe, the draw for the qualification groups was made in December and Russia was the only UEFA member not to be included with the remaining 54 nations divided amongst a dozen groups.

Argentina are the defending World Cup holders. (Image: Getty)Argentina are the defending World Cup holders. (Image: Getty)
Argentina are the defending World Cup holders. (Image: Getty)

Now, FIFA has suspended the football federations of two other nations with immediate effect due to 'serious circumstances' - essentially banning both nations from even the prospect of the 2026 World Cup.

The two countries are Congo and Pakistan and FIFA has explained the reasons behind both nations being suspended.

FIFA has banned Congolese Football Association, known as FECOFOOT, for what is described as a 'particularly serious situation of undue interference by third parties' in its affairs.

A FIFA statement read: "FECOFOOT has been suspended with immediate effect due to a particularly serious situation of undue interference by third parties in the affairs of the organisation, which constitutes a clear violation of FECOFOOT’s obligations in accordance with the FIFA Statutes.

"The decision was taken in consultation with CAF after two FIFA/CAF missions were dispatched to Brazzaville."

FIFA say the suspension will only be lifted under several conditions including returning FECOFOOT's headquarters to the full control of the Congolese Football Association, halting any efforts to 'change the signatories' of FECOFOOT's bank accounts, giving decisions to an ad hoc committee and ensuring full cooperation to allow the association to operate without any third party influence.

The Pakistan Football Federation (PFF) has also been suspended after it did not adopt a revised constitution that would 'ensure truly fair and democratic elections'.

The FIFA statement read: "The suspension will only be lifted subject to the PFF Congress approving the version of the PFF Constitution presented by FIFA and the AFC."

Congo currently sit bottom of Group E in the CAF qualification section, while Pakistan finished bottom of Group G in the second round of the qualification process in the AFC confederation.

Featured Image Credit: Getty

Topics: Football World CupFIFAFIFA World CupUEFARussia

FIFA threatens to ban country from international football and 2026 World Cup as official letter sentFIFA threatens to ban country from international football and 2026 World Cup as official letter sent

HomeFootballFootball News

FIFA threatens to ban country from international football and 2026 World Cup as official letter sent

FIFA are threatening strong action.


FIFA has reportedly threatened to ban a country from international football and the 2026 World Cup after sending an official letter to its government.

Aside from co-hosts Canada, Mexico and the United States, four other nations have secured qualification for the next World Cup.

Iran and Japan qualified from the AFC section earlier this week, while Argentina are already qualified from South America. New Zealand are the fourth team through to the tournament, via the OFC section.

The next World Cup will see an increase in competing nations from 32 to 48, giving the so-called 'smaller' nations, in footballing terms, a bigger opportunity than ever to qualify.

Several nations will not be competing in the World Cup due to FIFA suspensions. Russia are barred due to their invasion of Ukraine in 2022, while Pakistan and Congo were excluded from qualifying due to administrative failures and third-party interference respectively.

But another nation - who recently played against Russia in a friendly - may now be banned from the World Cup.

According to Soccer24.zw, FIFA have written to the football association of Zambia to warn them that they could be suspended from playing international football entirely.

Soccer24.zw - a domain used in neighbouring African country Zimbabwe - report that the National Sports Council of Zambia (NSCZ), a government organisation, had initially written to FIFA to call for the establishment of an independent electoral body and a 'thorough review of the Football Association of Zambia's electoral process'.

FIFA regulations ban third-party influence in a nation's footballing affairs, including from government bodies.

In February, Zambia FA president Andrew Kamanga was granted a third term in office unopposed, by virtue of eight other candidates being disqualified for failing to 'meet constitutional requirements'.

After launching independent appeals, however, four candidates had their disqualifications reversed. The elections will take place between March 15 and March 29, with a Zambia FA general meeting scheduled for the latter date.

The FIFA letter reads: "We would like to remind you that every member association of FIFA is statutorily obliged to manage its affairs independently and without undue influence from third parties, including the government bodies.

"Any breach of this obligation may lead to sanctions provided for in the FIFA statutes.

"As a result, should the transitional committee be indeed established, FAZ would be at risk of breaching the above-mentioned statutory provisions.

"Should this happen, FIFA will have no option but to submit the matter to its relevant decision-making body for consideration and decision, which might also include the suspension of FAZ."

Kamanga, meanwhile, is positive that FIFA will not ban Zambia from competing in international football.

"Ideally, it shouldn't," he said. "Because for me, what I believe is that, with FIFA, we did have a road map, and agreed in December in that programme to have the elections starting from the 15th of March up to the 29th of March.

"Of course, there's been different interpretations. But at the end of the day, as you can expect, FIFA only deals with the members.

"We expect that this issue will be resolved in due course, but it will be sad if we went the way of being sanctioned by FIFA, which I hope will not happen. I think everyone needs to find common ground."

On the pitch, Zambia are currently coached by the former Chelsea and West Ham manager Avram Grant.

Their star player is Leicester forward Patson Daka, who has scored 21 goals in his 47 caps for the nation

They are still able to qualify for the World Cup through African qualifying - from a group that has been beset with various issues.

Eritrea pulled out of qualifying before it began due to fears that its players would seek political asylum abroad, while Congo withdrew after three games played following their FIFA suspension.

They have four matches remaining in the group, and currently sit three points behind Niger, who occupy the second and final qualification spot for the next round.

Featured Image Credit: Getty

Topics: FIFAFIFA World CupAfrica Cup Of Nations

FIFA has banned 17 countries for breaking official regulations as major 2026 World Cup decision madeFIFA has banned 17 countries for breaking official regulations as major 2026 World Cup decision made

HomeFootballFootball NewsFIFA World Cup

FIFA has banned 17 countries for breaking official regulations as major 2026 World Cup decision made

One of the nations currently banned from competing in FIFA-sanctioned matches are Russia.


In total, FIFA have banned 17 countries for breaking their official regulations since 1950 – including three who have had their football associations suspended due to 'serious circumstances' ahead of the 2026 World Cup.

As of February 2025, 211 different nations are ranked in the FIFA's men's world rankings, with 194 competing in women's international football.

One of the nations currently banned from competing in FIFA-sanctioned matches are Russia following their invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Last year, FIFA and UEFA decided to uphold Russia's ban from worldwide competitions through to the 2026 World Cup.

And as we reported last week, FIFA has suspended the football federations of two other nations – Congo and Pakistan – with immediate effect due to serious circumstances, essentially banning them from the World Cup in the USA, Canada and Mexico.

In total, there are 17 countries who have been banned by FIFA since 2006. And while some of them have since been readmitted, others remain suspended.

In most of those cases, countries are banned from FIFA due to third-party interference – usually from the government – in footballing affairs.

Germany and Japan (1950 World Cup)

Germany and Japan were both barred from the 1950 World Cup – the first to be held since 1938 because of their actions during World War II.

In addition, the Japan Football Association was suspended in 1945 for failure to pay dues, while its German counterpart was completely disbanded in 1945 and not re-organised until after the tournament.

South Africa (1970 World Cup - 1990 World Cup)

South Africa were formerly suspended by FIFA in 1961 due to the nation's strict apartheid policies but Sir Stanley Rous, the FA chief who was appointed as FIFA president between 1961 and 1974, resisted calls to expel them from FIFA.

The nation was eventually expelled in 1976 once Joao Havelange replaced Rous.

The ban was not lifted until 1991, when apartheid was beginning to reach its end and a new football federation was formed.

A ban on playing tournaments officially began in 1970, though technically lasted through the 1966 World Cup as South Africa were simply not admitted as a FIFA member.

South Africa did not appear at the 1990 World Cup. Image credit: GettySouth Africa did not appear at the 1990 World Cup. Image credit: Getty
South Africa did not appear at the 1990 World Cup. Image credit: Getty

Mexico (1990 World Cup)

Mexico were barred from competing in FIFA tournaments for two years after they fielded four overage players during a qualifying round for a world junior tournament.

That meant they missed the 1990 World Cup, which was won by West Germany.

Chile (1994 World Cup)

Chile were banned from the 1994 World Cup after it was found that their goalkeeper Roberto Rojas had used a hidden blade in his glove to cut himself during a match against Brazil.

He previously claimed that he had been injured by a flare thrown by a fan. Rojas was subsequently banned from football for life.

Myanmar (2006 World Cup)

Myanmar, who have never qualified for a World Cup, were banned from even competing in the qualifying stages for the 2006 edition in Germany.

They were also fined $23,500 after pulling out of a qualifying match for the 2002 World Cup that was due to be played in Iran.

The other countries FIFA have banned include Russia (2022 World Cup, Euro 2024), Iraq (2008 and 2009), Nigeria (2014), Kuwait (2015), Indonesia (2015), Guatemala (2016), Pakistan (2017, 2021, 2025), Chad (2021), Zimbabwe (2022), Kenya (2022) and Congo (2025)

Featured Image Credit: Getty Images

Topics: FIFAFIFA World CupRussia

HomeFootballFootball NewsMan City

Man City and Chelsea fans banned from attending Club World Cup this summer

A statement has been issued confirming the ban enforced against Manchester City and Chelsea for the Club World Cup.



Supporters of Manchester City and Chelsea have been banned from attending this summer's FIFA Club World Cup tournament in the United States, it has been revealed.

The revamped competition takes place across the pond between June 14 and July 13, with 32 teams from six confederations taking to the pitch across 12 venues and 11 cities in the United States.

Chelsea and City, who have both won the competition in the past after winning the Champions League, are the two Premier League representatives and have been placed in Group D and Group G respectively.

Real Madrid, Bayern MunichBorussia Dortmund, Inter MilanParis Saint-Germain, Atletico MadridInter Miami, Fluminense and River Plate are among the big hitters participating in the hope of winning just short of £100 million in prize money.

But it's emerged that 150 fans from City and Chelsea have been prohibited from flying out for the showpiece.

According to The Sun, fans who have received Football Banning Orders imposed by the courts could have their plans thrown into disarray as they are poised to receive a letter demanding they surrender their passports.

In line with new legislation, those who have been punished for poor behaviour must hand over the document to the police for five weeks while the Club World Cup takes place.

It follows on from a similar approach being adopted for Euro 2024 in a bid to limit trouble amongst fans.

President Donald Trump and FIFA chief Gianni Infantino inspect the Club World Cup trophy. Image: GettyPresident Donald Trump and FIFA chief Gianni Infantino inspect the Club World Cup trophy. Image: Getty
President Donald Trump and FIFA chief Gianni Infantino inspect the Club World Cup trophy. Image: Getty

Commenting on the crackdown, Policing Minister Dame Diane Johnson said: “Many Manchester City and Chelsea fans will want to travel to support their teams in this summer's tournament and we want them all to do so safely and enjoyably.

"But for the tiny minority of troublemakers who use football as an excuse for criminality, we will be applying the same proven preventative measures that we have successfully done for other overseas tournaments.”

Club banned from the World Cup

The supporters are not the only ones banned from attending the tournament. Mexican side Club Leon have been kicked out after they “failed to meet the criteria on multi-club ownership”.

Leon, who FIFA determined were linked to fellow Mexico side CF Pachuca, were slated to be in the same group as Chelsea but a replacement will be confirmed in due course prior to the tournament getting underway.

It has been reported that FIFA are tying with the idea of having a play-off decide who gets the final spot.

FIFA Club World Cup groups

Group A: Palmeiras, FC Porto, Al Ahly, Inter Miami

Group B: Paris St-Germain, Atletico Madrid, Botafogo, Seattle Sounders

Group C: Bayern Munich, Auckland City, Boca Juniors, Benfica

Group D: Flamengo, Esperance Sportive de Tunisie, Chelsea,

Group E: River Plate, Urawa Red Diamonds, Monterrey, Inter Milan

Group F: Fluminense, Borussia Dortmund, Ulsan, Mamelodi Sundowns

Group G: Manchester City, Wydad, Al Ain, Juventus

Group H: Real Madrid, Al Hilal, Pachuca, Salzburg